An idle issue for lawyers or policy-makers;

Does everyone strive to belong? Must everything belong? Couldn’t there be something, which belonged to no one? Couldn’t there be someone, who belonged nowhere? Even if it were only … simply … a matter of rights?

There has been, after all, a thorough and extensive endeavour on basing and applying our rights on the material or personal aspects of our lives. However, we are dealing with an issue of belonging altogether, whether ownership or duty is in question. Can there be rights without bringing ownership or duty into question?

(//personal excerpt// a simple rhetorical question on our rights when objectively conflicted with ownership; let it be something or someone)